Developers Club geek daily blog

2 years, 5 months ago
Ice has started: KTs has published the draft document on paperless transfer of .RU domains between loggers
All good afternoon.
Some time ago on the site of KTs there was draft document "About the Procedure Which Is Subject to Application by Transfer of Support of Data on Domain Name between Loggers".
About key features read under cat.


Important provisions:
3. Delivery of AuthInfo-code to the administrator is carried out by the donor registrar one of ways at the choice of the administrator, including:
— providing in writing;
— with use of SMS authorization on the phone number of the administrator (with function of reception of short text messages (sms)) intended for carrying out procedure of transfer of support of the domain between loggers which is stored in the Register;
— with use of e-mail-authorization to the e-mail address of the administrator intended for carrying out procedure of transfer of support of the domain between loggers which is stored in the Register.

9.4. The donor registrar has the right to refuse transfer of support of the domain in case:
— availability of signs of fraud;
— emergence of the reasonable dispute connected with identification/authorization of the administrator;
— non-payment for last (complete) periods of registration if the term of registration of domain name has expired, or for the registered and current periods if the term of registration of the domain has not expired yet (...)

9.1. In time, specified in item 9 of Regulations [5 Earth days; la0 comment], the donor registrar has the right to carry out additional identification of the administrator and/or to request confirmation of the request for transfer of support of the domain to the registrar recipient from the administrator.
Additional check of the donor registrar is not obligatory. Within such check the confirmation duty to the donor registrar of the request for transfer of support of the domain to the registrar recipient is not assigned to the administrator. Therefore in case of lack of direct failure of the administrator from transfer of support of the domain to the registrar recipient (at inaction of the administrator) the donor registrar has no right to interfere with transfer of support of the domain.

4. The registrar recipient is obliged to carry out check:
— the coincidence which is stored in the Register for this domain name of AuthInfo-code with specified in the request for transfer of support of the domain;
— reality of AuthInfo-code;
— data fits of the person who has addressed with the request for transfer of support of the domain, with the data of the administrator of this domain name which are stored in the Register



Essence (etc. I do not consider cases of the expiration of registration, blocking):
  1. The donor registrar has to give out to Auth code within 3 days.
  2. The administrator bears this code to the new logger.
  3. The new registrar in writing either according to the SMS or on email requests confirmation and if receives it from the administrator, initiates transfer including with use of Auth of code.
  4. When the transfer is initiated, the donor registrar has five days on receiving protest of the administrator and if the registrar and the administrator do not declare protest at all, there is change of the logger.


In general still, as well as EPP in gTLD, with the same pluses and minuses:
Pluses: quickly (till 12 days), fashionably, molodyozhno bezbumazhno
Minuses: … well you have understood stuffy access to email, rerelease of sim card.
Important: It is so possible to change only the registrar. The administrator can be changed only in month after transfer.
With safety always so: or it is convenient or safe.

Thus: I consider that similar important and it is necessary as will give the chance to the ultimate user to replace the registrar ""if something happens" [1] and [2] and "to vote feet".
Whether it will be accepted and in what look — will show time.

PPS I perfectly understand that paperless transfer is possible and now. Anyway at most of registrars now it is implemented by issue of the power of attorney to the logger on implementation of the corresponding operation.

This article is a translation of the original post at habrahabr.ru/post/267049/
If you have any questions regarding the material covered in the article above, please, contact the original author of the post.
If you have any complaints about this article or you want this article to be deleted, please, drop an email here: sysmagazine.com@gmail.com.

We believe that the knowledge, which is available at the most popular Russian IT blog habrahabr.ru, should be accessed by everyone, even though it is poorly translated.
Shared knowledge makes the world better.
Best wishes.

comments powered by Disqus