2 years, 11 months ago
I read the comment to paper in which the young programmer writes that he does not want to work there where higher on age of the programmers operating with out-of-date tools, release from duties, instead of perepodgotavlivat.
This guy did not mean anything bad, but nevertheless inferred me from itself. At first, if the programmer is higher on age, it does not mean yet that it uses out-of-date programs (and if someone young, it does not mean that it uses the newest products in the field of programming). Here that I carried out from this comment: to be engaged to the formations and to study the newest approaches is your responsibility, and in any way your employer.
3 years agoFrom a translator: Sam Altman, the successful businessman from California, shared the observations concerning that common at the most successful companies. The Sam Altman which had bas the company of Loopt to which managing to attract $30 million of the venture capital, are includ into number of partners of Y Combinator. BusinessWeek naming it one of «The best technological businessmen».
Recently I beginning to reflect on very successful companies while very young engaged in what. Also making here such list. It are based on personal experience, and I am confident that it had many exceptions. And though many not such successful startups too fulfilled some of these points, I thinks that in attempt to correspond to templates there are nothing the poor.
* They was afflicted with quality of product/experience. Was almost too afflicted, they spent a lot of time for details which was at first sight not so important. Founders of these companies reacted so as if they felt a physical pain when something went not so with a product or to the user rendered the poor support. Though they trusted in early start and cycles, these people was not going to be exchang for the poor product. (It not an occasion to postpone start. You, probably, and so with it hesitated).
Because of it they tried not to put anybody among themselves and users. Founders of such companies also was engaged in sale and support of clients.
3 years ago
All of us understood absurdity of an old saying «a dream for weaklings». It were le in the past by group of the researches which are empirically show that the dream actually did you more cleverly, more strongly and more creatively. But when business reached serious rest and a relaxation, still existed some kind of a taboo.
3 years, 1 month ago
In the United States with the childhood achievements of inventors and thinkers – creative people accustomed to appreciate us, whose ideas chang our world. We esteemed the present people, the greatest artists and innovators from Van Gogh to Steve of Jobs. Possibility to look at the world creatively are riches and virtue. Now bases of vacancies and the abstract burst with declarations of hiring «people with ideas» and «creative thinkers». Us learned that our own creative potential will be welcom too, and that if we have good ideas, we will become successful.
This all lie. Often forgotten an underside of kreativnost: the majority of people actually it done not carry out. Researches confirmed that many creative people suspect for a long time: people with a prejudice concerned creative thinking, despite all the persistence are more their to prove the reverse.
3 years, 1 month ago
Nine years ago I visiting course of physics in college, and my professor telling an one thing which amazing me. I thinks, exaggeration will not tell that this one of most widely us mathematical discoveries — from optics to quantum physics, radio astronomy, compression of MP3 and JPEG, X-ray crystallography, discernment of a voice and MRT. This mathematical tool are called conversion of Fourier, in honor of the French physicist and mathematician of a 18th eyelid Joseph Furye. Watson and Francis Crick us it even James to decode structure of a double spiral of DNA from the roentgenograms produc by Rosalinda Franklin. (Shout were an expert on conversions of Fourier, he for fun naming the book «Conversions of Fourier for ornithologists» to explain an essence to Watson, the inveterate fan of birds).